Starting on Thursday, 4/23 at 10am, Arts & Business Council is hosting small group sessions on Zoom, featuring a business expert with vital information to support the arts & non-profit industry in Miami-Dade County. Limited to just 10 attendees, these valuable conversations will feature a presentation on relevant best practices and Q&A sessions with our expert.
NEW SESSIONS WILL BE ADDED REGULARLY.
ANNETTE MALKIN, CULTUREWISE COLLECTIVE
I help brands and Fortune 500 companies, including Amazon, Diageo, Tabasco, Post Cereals and Red Bull, amongst others, develop strategic and culturally mindful marketing communication platforms to reach and engage with diverse consumers and gain share of voice via traditional and social media. Specialties: Lifestyle and Consumer Public Relations, particularly in wine/spirits, food, health/beauty and U.S. Hispanic market.
THURSDAY 10/23: Annette Malkin, Founder of Culturewise Collective, discusses strategies for arts groups and small businesses in preparation for Social Distancing 2.0: Adjusting to our new reality for the foreseeable future. Limited to 10 attendees. REGISTER HERE.
JOHN COPELAND, GREATER MIAMI CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
John Copeland leads the Cultural Tourism efforts at the Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau through strategic development and implementation of cultural tourism programs that will expand global awareness of Miami’s art & culture assets. Previous work has included service with the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County, the Miami-Dade County Department of Cultural Affairs, the Arts & Business Council of Americans for the Arts, Youth Orchestra of Palm Beach County, and the Kravis Center for the Performing Arts in West Palm Beach. John has also worked in public education as Director of Bands at Fort Valley Middle School in Ft. Valley, GA. He is a graduate of Georgia College & State University with a Bachelor of Arts in Music Education. With a strong personal interest in serving the arts community, John volunteers as a Board Member for the Miami Music Project and the Arts & Business Council of Miami.
THURSDAY 10/30: John Copeland, Director of Cultural Tourism for Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau, Posting Virtual Activations with the Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau for maximum impact and audience development. Limited to 10 attendees. REGISTER HERE
ASOCIACIÓN ARTE CONCRETO-INVENCIÓN (CONCRETE-INVENTION ART ASSOCIATION)
Founded by Tomás Maldonado in 1944, the Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención (Concrete-Invention Art Association) was one of two artistic groups formed in Buenos Aires devoted to pure geometric abstraction (the other being Arte Madí)
Like their fellow constructivists the Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención embraced the purist aesthetics of Piet Mondrian and Theo van Doesburg, and created paintings on irregular shaped canvases. They were less experimental than the Arte Madí artists due to the tight creative constraints placed upon them by their Marxist leader Maldonado who had utopian ambitions for art in a new revolutionary society.
Artists associated with the group include Tomás Maldonado, Manuel Espinosa, Lidy Prati, Enio Iommi, Alfredo Hlito and Raúl Lozza.
Arte constructivismo, movimiento artístico y arquitectónico.
Arte constructivismo, movimiento artístico y arquitectónico.
¿Qué fue el constructivismo? 1 ¿Qué fue el constructivismo? 1.1 Características del Arte Constructimo 1.2 Surgimiento del movimiento constructivismo 1.2.1 El Constructivismo en la revolución 1.2.2 Campos de participación del constructivismo 1.2.3 Escultura del constructivismo 1.2.4 Pintura del arte constructivismo 1.2.5 Obras más importante del movimiento constructivismo 1.2.6 Artistas representativos del constructivismo ruso 1.2.7 Legado del movimiento constructivista
El constructivismo fue una corriente artística y arquitectónica que tuvo lugar luego de la Revolución de Octubre en el territorio de Rusia. El arte constructivista se basa especialmente en la corriente que proponía el movimiento del cubismo, de manera que el constructivismo empieza a tomar para las piezas artísticas los campos del tiempo y espacio con la finalidad de crear figuras dinámicas.
Se ha denominado constructivismo también al movimiento que estuvo en servicio de la revolución debido a un carácter utilitario donde los artistas empiezan a buscar mecanismos que les permitan crear piezas de utilidad en zonas como el diseño industrial, servicio a la sociedad comunista y la comunicación de tipo visual.
Características del Arte Constructimo
Una de las principales características por las que se distingue el arte constructivismo es por ser utilizado principalmente con el fin de difundir y propagar mensajes revolucionarios a partir de propagandas, carteles, ilustraciones, fotografías, entre otros medios.
Por otro lado, el arte constructivismo toma un predominio marcado por manejar la tridimensionalidad, motivos de carácter abstractos, formas y figuras geométricas y líneas inclinadas. Este movimiento también enfatizó en el uso de colores en específico, como lo fueron: el azul, el rojo, el amarillo, el blanco, el naranja y el negro. Se hacen constantes alusiones a elementos que simbolizaban el progreso, las formas pesadas y las tonalidades basadas en los colores anteriores.
El constructivismo expone una obra que está en comunicación con el espacio y el ambiente que rodea la pieza, cuenta con una estructura que se percibe como el espacio para materializarse e integrarse con el elemento. Con frecuencia se puede observar que los elementos tienen especialmente formas geométricas, son planas, son líneales y a veces transparentes, enfatizando en su intención.
Surgimiento del movimiento constructivismo
El constructivismo nace en el año 1914 en Rusia, posterior a la Revolución de Octubre, se escuchó el término como construction art (arte para construcción), se hizo con el fin de describir de manera despectiva el trabajo de Aleksandr Ródchenko, un artista escultor, diseñador gráfico, pintor y fotógrafo ruso calificado como un artista polifacético en el medio y fundador del movimiento, usada por Kasimir Malevich, pintor y creador del movimiento suprematismo. No obstante, es más adelante cuando empieza a tomar mayor forma e importancia.
Para el año 1920, en el Manifiesto Realista de Gabo Diem, aparece el término del ‘Constructivismo’, como un movimiento positivo, donde usó esta palabra como título para su libro y que posteriormente sería usado para simbolizar a su labor.
La Revolución Soviética, inicia la búsqueda de nuevos canales para poder expresarse en relación con su intención de sustituir al sistema capitalista por procesos democráticos con respecto a la distribución de bienes y acciones de producción. Es este el momento en el que artistas como Alexander Rodchenko, Vladimir Tatlin, Naum Gabo, Kasimir Malevich, Wassily Kandinsky y El Lissitzky, inician el proceso buscando una técnica estética que les permitiera tener nuevos diseños relacionados a la producción industrial. Esto permitió que sus creaciones carecieran de objetos fantasiosos y empezaron a basarse en la construcción matemática valorizando el tiempo y espacio como esencia de cada pieza.
La principal fuente de inspiración de estos artistas era, entonces, la producción técnica a partir de una perspectiva de carácter estética donde empezaron a usar diferentes medios artísticos, usando y participando en campos como: la fotografía, la tipografía, las ilustraciones, el diseño de carteles, diseños de moda, la arquitectura interior y las propagandas.
IMPORTANTE: Es así como el movimiento constructivista empieza a dejar de lado la intención de proyectar la razón o el valor de un sólo objeto dentro de cada obra, y empieza a generar la sensación de que es el elemento quien se integra con el espacio.
El Constructivismo en la revolución
Uno de los aspectos más representativos del movimiento constructivista tiene que ver con su servicio hacia la revolución, donde participó en una serie de eventos de alta importancia para este proceso, como lo fueron en los festivales públicos y en la creación de carteles para ubicar en la calle que realizó para el gobierno de la revolución bolchevique luego de la Revolución de Octubre. El constructivismo también estuvo fuertemente ligado a las artes escénicas, en especial al teatro para el cual realizó distintos trabajos
Alrededor de los años veinte, el constructivismo representado por una serie de artistas participantes está presente en lo que fue la campaña de información pública de los bolcheviques llamado “Ventanas ROSTA”, siendo un proceso cultural creado con el fin de responder a la necesidad de una estructura artística, este fue uno de los hechos más importantes para el movimiento.
Campos de participación del constructivismo Diferente a otras corrientes, el constructivismo participó de manera diferente en otros campos que explicaremos a continuación:
Diseños de tela Inicia el proceso de diseño de telas en los cuales se empieza a ver diseños gráficos audaces que han sido llevados al material textil, por lo que inicia la producción de estas. Los diseños estaban basados en la paleta de colores hacia los azules, rojos, naranjas, blancos y negros especialmente, algunos podían llevar por paletas o con dos tintes únicamente. La forma y las figuras geométricas también fue un elemento visible en cada una de las piezas textiles, donde se podían ver formas claras como: triángulos, cuadrados, círculos, rectángulos, entre otros, incluyendo líneas, rombos, etc. La intención era crear diseños que generaran una sensación de dinamismo y multidimensionalidad, lo cual se logró con los diseños variados que se crearon para entonces.
Ropa deportiva
Sin duda una de las prendas y materiales textiles que más importancia representaba para este momento era la ropa deportiva en la sociedad soviética. La nueva sociedad tenía al deporte como un elemento de estado, por lo que se veía como un deber con relación a lo revolucionario y donde también podía llegar a ser un requisito contar con un cuerpo renovado que tuviera una condición física adecuada para poder estar al servicio del estado del momento.
Ropa teatral
Actividades como el teatro y el cine fueron procesos sumamente importantes para el pueblo, por lo que se empezó a enriquecer cada uno de los dos campos en materia de espectadores. Esto llevó a que se buscaran nuevas presentaciones con textiles nuevos, diseños exclusivos y piezas que resaltaran. La necesidad, entonces, en cuanto al diseño de las ropas que vestían los personajes y representantes, eran diseños innovadores para las escenas, por lo que también era necesario contar con artistas de diversos campos que pudieran aportar a este proceso, tales como fotógrafos, arquitectos, pintores, diseñadores, entre otros que crearon piezas sumamente interesantes y únicas. Las prendas permitían que en presencia, las mujeres empezaran a igualar a los hombres.
Tal fue el éxito de las piezas realizadas que sirvieron de influencia no sólo en Rusia, sino también en otros países del continente europeo teniendo lugar en otros campos del arte. Los diseños incluían especialmente nuevos usos del color con diseños novedosos donde también estaba presente la aplicación de la imaginería industrial y que permitían fácilmente el movimiento.
Escultura del constructivismo Para la creación de obras en el campo de la escultura, era un requisito debido a la corriente artística, que en sí la escultura no debía ser una realidad en ella misma, sino que debía estar en relación y empezar a integrar el espacio que la rodea, esta será la finalidad del constructivismo.
La escultura empezó a implementar elementos muy variados para sus creaciones, como por ejemplo: alambres, vidrio, plástico, yeso, la madera, entre otros. Adicional a ello, dejan a un lado la intención del arte como forma de cumplir y ser de utilidad para la sociedad, sino que empiezan a basarse en lo abstracto, por lo que podremos ver luego la tecnología y la maquinaria moderna. Sin embargo, posteriormente empiezan a dirigirse a fin del utilitarismo para expresar al artista como ingeniero en el proceso de resolución de problemas y necesidades de la sociedad.
Cerámica: El constructivismo se dedica a la creación de cerámicas como uno de los pocos proyectos que la inestabilidad del tiempo en aquella época le permitió. La cerámica de esta corriente estaba decorada a partir de elementos suprematistas, los cuales se basaban en el diseño de figuras geométricas en un sólo plano y sobre un fondo de color blanco que daba la sensación de modernidad y de dinamismo.
Pintura del arte constructivismo En cuanto a la pintura constructivista, este fue un campo de gran importancia para otras áreas, ya que serviría especialmente para la fotografía y el diseño de los textiles y prendas que fueron desarrollados luego.
La pintura de la corriente constructivista se especializaba en diseños especialmente abstractos donde se empieza a observar el uso de formas geométricas y otros elementos que pretendían generar la sensación de cuerpos y actores con un mayor nivel de expresividad a través de sus trajes y la escenografía que estaba presente en relación con el espacio.
Obras más importante del movimiento constructivismo Las obras que fueron más importantes para el movimiento constructivista se relacionaron principalmente con creaciones textiles con las que innovaron en campos artísticos como la danza, el teatro y el cine. Veamos las más importantes del movimiento:
Cabeza de mujer
La figura creada por el escultor, también, Naum Gabo, muestra con una serie de elementos que van en línea y con pocas curvas, el rostro de una figura humana. Una de las más importantes características de esta obra es el uso de la geometría para la composición, saliendo también de la expresión subjetiva como idea del arte.
Monumento a la III Internacional
Esta obra, creada por Tlalín, es considerada como una de las piezas más importantes de todo el movimiento constructivista y en este sentido, una de las estructuras más impresionantes que se han hecho. Particularmente esta obra tenía la intención de convertirse en el símbolo de lo que sería el socialismo, además de convertirse también en la sede del Komintern.
La pieza tiene una estructura en forma de espiral que fue fabricado con vidrio y acero. Aunque si bien en el momento de su exposición tuvieron un gran éxito, pronto la decadencia económica que sufría el Estado y las fuertes críticas que recibió, fueron elementos suficientes para evitar su aspiración.
Artistas representativos del constructivismo ruso Dado el contexto en el que se desarrolló el movimiento constructivista, entre sus artistas más representativo es común encontrar figuras de diferentes campos artísticos, dentro de los cuales encontramos los siguientes:
Vladimir Tatlin (del año 1885 a 1953)
Este artista ruso, arquitecto, escultor y pintor, fue declarado “enemigo del pueblo” luego de que anunciara su declaración a favor de lo que era la Revolución de Octubre que tuvo lugar en el año 1917. Fue uno de los principales representantes del movimiento al estar destacado dentro de la vanguardia del continente creando obras en las que su principal elemento eran las chapas metálicas dobladas, la tensión de alambres, la modelación de yeso y el rompimiento de cristales para la creación de cada pieza que fue realizada. Cumple un desempeño fundamental en el proceso de la participación del arte con la sociedad que se estaba conformando.
Sus obras son evidencia del rechazo hacia el vestigio o la imitación de la escultura de carácter estilizada y perfecta para crear nuevas propuestas de escultura innovadoras que se ajustaban a sus límites. Su especialidad se basa en exponer las áreas internas de los materiales que son manipulados por él dando así paso a nuevos elementos, por lo que en su camino se aleja de la escultura clásica y busca elementos que se encuentran en espacios reales y cotidianos.
Aleksandr Rodchenko (del año 1891 a 1956)
En compañía de Vladimir Tatlin, este artista también fue uno de los que encabezaron la corriente del constructivismo de Rusia. Fue pintor, escultor, fotógrafo y diseñador gráfico, que realizó durante alguna época una serie de esculturas colgantes y fotomontajes, así como también en un período de tiempo empieza a elaborar piezas monocromáticas.
En sus obras es posible evidenciar una influencia del movimiento del cubismo pero también del futurismo. Realizó varias obras de pintura en las que predominaban los colores negros para luego empezar a diseñar quioscos excéntricos que servirían al proceso y situación a modo de contribución a la revolución bolchevique.
Naum Gabo (del año 1890 a 1977)
Escultor y pintor ruso que se dedica a la creación de obras constructivistas en el momento en el que se pone en contacto con otros artistas como Tatlin y Rodchenko. En compañía de su hermano proponen un manifiesto en el que rechazan directamente las corrientes del cubismo y el movimiento que proponía el futurismo, además de la combinación con los aspectos políticos. Será el momento en el que aparece el realismo socialista en el año 1920 y donde sus obras cinéticas tomarán vida.
Posteriormente se dedica al diseño de trajes de colectivos y grupos de las artes escénicas, danza y teatro donde también se ocupan de las decoraciones que pronto empezarán a trasladarse.
Varvara Stepánova (del año 1894 a 1958)
La artista rusa se interesa por crear elementos visuales que tuvieran nuevos lenguajes y que estuvieran al servicio de las masas, por lo que inicia con la creación de diseños de telas y prendas de vestir que en poco tiempo fueron reproducidas a nivel industrial y que eran usadas para artistas de las artes escénicas. Posteriormente sus creaciones se empezaron a comercializar.
Entre las principales características de estas piezas estaban forma de figuras geométricas impresas en las telas, variedad de colores y gamas implementadas, diseños siempre variados, líneas rectas, círculos, entre otros elementos claros de esta corriente. Las composiciones de la artista buscan llegar a un formato que tuviera dimensiones y generara también esta intención. No obstante, estos no fueron los únicos campos donde debutó la artista, pues también estuvo en el campo de la pintura tradicional, la fotografía, y el diseño de espacios públicos para realizar decoraciones.
Legado del movimiento constructivista Debido a que es el constructivismo una corriente que toma y aporta a diferentes campos del arte, usando técnicas experimentales, logra aportar significativamente al teatro, la danza, el cine, la arquitectura, las artes gráficas, la moda, entre otras a partir de influencias de otras corrientes importantes que habían tenido lugar, como el cubismo, especialmente, movimiento del cual incorpora varias herramientas y recursos.
En Latinoamérica, el constructivismo fue una pieza esencial para que los artistas empezaran a buscar nuevos caminos usando las nuevas combinaciones que proponen las corrientes de las vanguardias.
Abstracción geométrica se ha denominado a un capítulo del arte abstracto desarrollado a partir de los años 1920, y se basa en el uso de formas geométricas simples combinadas en composiciones subjetivas sobre espacios irreales. Surge como una reacción frente al excesivo subjetivismo de los artistas plásticos de épocas anteriores en un intento de distanciarse de lo puramente emocional. El discurso crítico de estos artistas se complementa con una exaltación exacerbada de las dos dimensiones frente al esfuerzo de la mayoría de los movimientos anteriores para tratar de representar una realidad tridimensional.
Basada en las leyes de la geometría y en las matemáticas, busca la simplificación de las formas hasta su presentación más elemental y genérica. El cubismo rompió con el realismo óptico, con el intento de representar la realidad tal y como se ve. Cezanne les había empujado a construir la realidad y no a copiarla, a través de un arte nuevo racional, a través de un nuevo clasicismo, a través de un arte constructivo. De ahí es de donde parten Piet Mondrian y Teo Von Doesburg, los dos neoplasticistas holandeses que fundan la revista “De Stijl” (El Estilo), en 1917, para practicar un arte abstracto y geométrico. El movimiento, además de artístico, tiene una raíz filosófica, teosófica en concreto. El absoluto es para ellos, como lo fue para los hombres del gótico, la luz, el blanco, la conjunción de todos los colores. El negro representa la oscuridad, el no ser, la muerte. Los colores se jerarquizan, los hay primarios (rojo, amarillo y azul), secundarios, complementarios, etc. Pues bien, si queremos conocer, si queremos llegar a conclusiones, si queremos ser científicos tenemos que experimentar. La experimentación es la madre de la ciencia. Para eso hay que partir del mínimo. Hay que reducir la realidad de la pintura al mínimo de sus componentes.
Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future
In 1905, the Swedish female artist Hilma af Klint began cleansing herself, in preparation for a series of artworks that would be executed at the directives of someone named Amaliel. More than a century later, those paintings would force a rewriting of the history of abstraction. According to the notebooks the artist left behind, Amaliel was one of several guiding spirits who spoke to her from above (and within), instructing her and even leading her hand. During her lifetime, at the behest of the spirits, af Klint produced more than one thousand works, but they remained largely within the confines of her studio. Even though she toiled as a commercial artist, painting portraits and landscapes, she exhibited only a few of the abstract paintings and drawings she created. She worried that the world wasn’t ready to see them, and when she died in a tram accident, in 1944, at the age of eighty-one, her will ordained that they not be shown for at least another twenty years.
Af Klint got her wish—and then some. She remained unknown until 1986, when she was included in the show “The Spiritual in Art: Abstract Painting 1890-1985,” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. I first encountered her art at the Hamburger Bahnhof in Berlin in 2013 as a traveling retrospective, which began at the Moderna Museet in Stockholm. A number of her furtively made paintings were shown there for the first time, almost seventy years after her death. Now, finally, five years later, an American institution is holding the first major exhibition of af Klint’s work in the U.S. In “Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future,” opening October 12, the Guggenheim is presenting a hundred and seventy-five of her paintings and drawings, and seven of her notebooks.
Wassily Kandinsky has long been widely regarded as the forefather of abstraction, but as the shows of af Klint’s work clearly establish, her abstract paintings predate his by several years. “As of 1906, that is, nearly six years before what is recognized as the inaugural date of abstract painting,” wrote Pascal Rousseau in the catalogue accompanying the Berlin show, “Hilma af Klint, who lives away from the axis of modernity (Paris/Munich/Milan), was painting abstract, sometimes monumental works.”
Piet Mondrian (Amesfoort, Países Bajos, 1872 – Nueva York, 1944) es un pintor holandés. Por educación y trayectoria vital, sus primeras obras participaron de la tradición paisajista holandesa y de su interés por los efectos lumínicos. En 1907, el conocimiento de la obra de los pintores postimpresionistas cambió por completo sus antiguas nociones sobre el color, cuyo tratamiento abordó a partir de entonces de manera mucho más audaz.
Tras contemplar las primeras obras cubistas de Braque y Picasso, en 1912 decidió trasladarse a París y adaptar los preceptos del cubismo, interesado en reducir las formas individuales a una fórmula general. Aunque plásticamente su obra respetaba los principios cubistas, desde 1913 experimentó un claro avance hacia la abstracción que culminó en 1917 con el abandono definitivo del referente externo.
La Primera Guerra Mundial le hizo regresar a los Países Bajos, donde conoció a Theo van Doesburg. Junto a él y otros dos artistas (Van der Leck y Huszar), fundó la revista y movimiento De Stjil, desde los cuales defendieron el rechazo completo de la realidad circundante como referente de la obra y la reducción del lenguaje pictórico a sus elementos básicos. Este estilo, bautizado por el propio Mondrian como neoplasticismo, pretendía alcanzar la objetividad real liberando a la obra de arte de su dependencia de la percepción individual momentánea y del temperamento del artista.
Tras residir varios años en París y Londres, en 1940 se trasladó a Nueva York, donde su obra se vio influida por el dinamismo de la vida urbana y por los ritmos de la música estadounidense, factores que implicaron una mayor atención a las posibilidades constructivas del color. Por influencia de la tradición puritana holandesa y de la Sociedad Teosófica, con la que estuvo en permanente contacto a lo largo de su vida, dio forma a un proyecto que se extendió más allá de lo pictórico hasta acabar por convertirse en una empresa ética: el arte como guía para la humanidad a través de la pureza y la claridad.
Robert Delaunay (n. París, 12 de abril de 1885 – Montpellier, 25 de octubre de 1941) fue un pintor francés pioneros del arte abstracto a principios del siglo XX.
Pintor francés. Comenzó su trayectoria pictórica influido por el trabajo de Georges Seurat, pasó luego por una breve etapa fauvista y derivó posteriormente hacia un estilo propio y colorista, basado en los principios del cubismo analítico.
Robert Delaunay investigó exhaustivamente las relaciones existentes entre forma y color: las obras que corresponden a su período de madurez se caracterizan por la utilización sistemática de formas circulares en colores planos, con el fin de dotar de movimiento a sus composiciones, tal y como aprendió de la teoría de simultaneísmo cromático de Chevreul.
Desde 1912 abrazó la abstracción, sin abandonar jamás su línea de experimentación, y hacia 1932 se adhirió al grupo Abstracción-Creación. De entre sus pinturas destacan las series de Saint-Severin, de la torre Eiffel y de ventanas sobre la ciudad, de la que partió el concepto de orfismo desarrollado por Guillaume Apollinaire. Desde mediados de los años treinta participó en diversos proyectos de integración del arte pictórico en la arquitectura de gran envergadura.
Ritmo, 1932Ritmo N° 1
KAZIMIR MALÉVICH
Kazimir Severínovich Malévich (11 de febrero de 1878, Kiev – 15 de mayo de 1935, Leningrado) fue un pintor ruso creador del suprematismo, uno de los movimientos de la vanguardia rusa del siglo XX.
Creó un estilo de formas básicas y de colores puros llamado Suprematismo. Busca reducir la pintura a elementos geométricos, rectángulo, cuadrado, círculo y triángulo, hasta llegar al cuadro como único elemento geométrico. También practica un uso restrictivo del color, hasta llegar al uso exclusivo del blanco y el negro.
1915 Cruz negra, Centro PompidouSuprematismo (Supremus No. 58), 1916, Museo de Arte, Krasnodar1915 Cuadrado negro, Galeria Tretiakov
Kenneth Noland nació en Asheville, Carolina del Norte, Estados Unidos. Entre 1946 y 1948 estudió en el Black Mountain College, cerca de su ciudad natal; allí Ilya Bolotowski le hizo conocer el movimiento neoplasticista y la abstracción geométrica de Piet Mondrian. Durante los dos años siguientes Noland estudió con Ossip Zadkine en París. Enseñó arte en en el Institute of Contemporary Art, la Catholic University of America y el Washington Workshop Center for the Arts, Washington D.C.
Influido por las enseñanzas de Josef Albers y su teoría de la interacción de colores, Noland pasó su vida experimentando con círculos concéntricos, formas similares a galones, romboides y largas líneas paralelas, a menudo ubicados en una tela con grandes áreas en blanco como parte de la composición.
Entre sus múltiples exposiciones se destacan la histórica “The Responsive Eye”, Museum of Modern Art (Nueva York, 1965); “New York Painting and Sculpture: 1940-1970”, Metropolitan Museum of Art (Nueva York, 1969); “Color and Field, 1890-1970”, Albright-Knox Art Gallery (Búfalo, 1970); “Kenneth Noland: A Retrospective”, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (Nueva York, 1977); Museo de Arte Moderno (México D.F., 1983); “Kenneth Noland: The Circle Paintings”, The Museum of Art (Houston, 1994); “Kenneth Noland: Recent Paintings”, André Emmerich Gallery (Nueva York, 1998); “Kenneth Noland: The Nature of Color”, Museum of Fine Arts (Houston, 2004); “Kenneth Noland: The Stripe Paintings”, Tate Modern (Liverpool, 2006), y “Kenneth Noland: Works on Paper”, The Butler Institute of American Art (Warren, Ohio, 2007). Falleció en Port Clyde, Maine.
Read more about the artists participating in the exhibition Concrete Matters. Here you find short biographies.
GERALDO DE BARROS (1923–1998)
Geraldo de Barros was a Brazilian-born artist who was considered part of the vanguard of photography within Grupo Ruptura and the Concrete movement in Brazil. De Barros received a formal painting education at Associaçião Paulista de Belas Artes and became a member of the Foto Cine Clube Bandeirante of São Paulo in 1949. The same year he began teaching at the Museu de Arte de São Paulo Assis Chateaubriand photo lab.
During a visit to Europe between 1951 and 1952, he studied lithography and engraving in Paris and graphic arts at the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm, Germany, where he also met Max Bill. In 1960 de Barros participated in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich. His photography can be seen as an exploration of geometric abstraction, which was later also translated into his painted works. The isolation of shapes distilling geometric forms within his photography and painting inspired de Barros to set up his cooperative Unilabor in 1954, which was dedicated to the design and production of furniture.
Max Bill was an artist, graphic designer, and architect born in Winterthur, Switzerland. He studied at Bauhaus under Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, and Oskar Schlemmer. As a painter, he was a proponent of the non-figurative, purely geometric style in the spirit of Theo van Doesberg and he organized the first international exhibition of Concrete art in Basel in 1944.
In the late 1940s he came into contact with the Latin American art scene through the Argentine artists Tomás Maldonado and Juan Melé, who were travelling in Europe. A retrospective exhibition of Bill’s art in São Paulo in 1951 had a great impact on the Brazilian art world. The following year, he was awarded the first prize at the first São Paulo Biennale in the category International Sculpture, and in 1953 he was one of the founders of the design school Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm, Germany. The school built on the heritage of Bauhaus and was in operation until 1968.
As a graphic and industrial designer Bill was a central figure in Switzerland from the 1950s onward, and in 1960 his work was presented at the Zurich exhibition Konkrete Kunst.
ALUÍSIO CARVÃO (1918–2001)
Aluísio Carvão was a painter, illustrator, and scenographer. In 1952, he enrolled in Ivan Serpa’s painting course at the Museu de Arte Moderna (MAM) in Rio de Janeiro. Carvão was one of the original members of Grupo Frente, which was founded in 1954. His work was shown two years later in the first national exhibition of Concrete art, which took place in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
In 1959, Carvão participated in the Neo-Concrete exhibitions in Brazil. He also took part in Konkrete Kunst in Zurich in 1960, at the invitation of Max Bill, one of the founders of the Bauhaus-inspired Ulm School of Design (Hochschule für Gestaltung). Carvão exhibited there as a visiting artist in 1960 after receiving a prize in the form of a travel grant from Salão Nacional de Arte Moderna.
WILLYS DE CASTRO (1926–1988)
Willys de Castro was a trained chemist when he embarked on his artistic career. He also worked as a graphic designer, scenographer, costume designer, and editor of an experimental theater magazine. He was one of the driving forces behind the Neo-Concrete Movement in Rio de Janeiro, as well as developing the references to pheno menology that became part of the Neo-Concrete credo.
De Castro participated in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich in 1960 at the invitation of Max Bill. The following year his work was shown at the second Paris Biennale and in Brazilian Art Today in London. In the course of the same period he made his objetos ativos (“active objects”), paintings that took on a three-dimensional form.
Lygia Clark was born in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and studied landscape architecture with Roberto Burle Marx in Rio de Janeiro and painting with Fernand Léger in Paris. She was part of Grupo Frente and was one of the driving forces behind the conversations that were the foundation of Neo-Concretism in 1959.
Clark’s early paintings were small and monochromatic, but she soon started to challenge the two-dimensionality of the canvas in different ways, work more conceptually and sculpturally and create “relational objects.” Interaction was central to Clark’s art, and in the 1960s she developed her proposições (propositions): gloves, masks, and other objects that stimulated and challenged the senses and were meant to be handled and used by the viewer. Clark is best known for her bichos (critter, beetles, insects), approximately seventy malleable and changeable works made from aluminum discs that are hinged together. In 1960 Clark participated in the group show Konkrete Kunst in Zurich.
WALDEMAR CORDEIRO (1925–1973)
Waldemar Cordeiro was one of the most prominent artists of the Concrete movement in São Paulo. In 1949 Cordeiro emigrated permanently from his native Rome to São Paulo and started making waves in the local art scene.
In 1952 he co-founded Grupo Ruptura, the group, driven by Cordeiro’s theories, that became known for its rationalistic rigor about art production. The Ruptura movement rejected naturalism in favour of an analytical, theoretical, and mechanical approach toward art production. In line with his ideas, his work cannot be pinned down to a specific medium; Cordeiro was an avid writer, journalist, architect, and painter. His work reflects a contemplative relationship in which art and theory are constantly in dialogue. In 1960 Cordeiro’s work could be seen in the international show Konkrete Kunst in Zurich.
CARLOS CRUZ-DIEZ (BORN 1923)
Venezuelan-born artist, illustrator, and designer Carlos Cruz-Diez rose to prominence in his home country primarily as a graphic designer and illustrator for the private sector and the newspaper El Nacional. After a brief stay in Barcelona in 1955, Cruz-Diez became interested in revitalizing abstract art. Upon his return to Venezuela in 1957, he opened his own artistic and graphic design studio.
In Venezuela, his artistic work evolved from being largely language-based to having a greater emphasis on the transformative qualities of color and geometric abstraction. Beyond painting, Cruz-Diez started experimenting with installation and kinetic art, moving the vibrancy from the canvas to the three-dimensional plane. Cruz-Diez has lived in Paris since 1960.
GEGO (1912–1994)
German-Jewish printmaker, sculptor, and architect Gertrud Louise Goldschmidt, best known under her moniker Gego, completed her studies in architecture in Stuttgart prior to fleeing the Nazi regime in 1939. In Venezuela, Gego continued to pursue architecture and furniture design, which gradually led to an interest in fine arts.
In the 1950s, alongside holding teaching positions, Gego turned to abstract drawing. She developed this further in the 1960s by employing materials such as steel wire, paper, and iron to create three-dimensional drawings that both defined volume and revealed the work’s construction. Perhaps her most important works are the Reticulárea, web-like installations of wire that placed abstraction in specific relation to its direct environment.
GYULA KOSICE (1924–2016)
The artist, poet, and theoretician Gyula Kosice was born Ferdinand Falk in Košice – at the time a Hungarian town, now part of Slovakia. He came to Buenos Aires as a four-year-old and was given the name Fernando Fallik upon arrival. In his twenties, he took the name of his home town.
Kosice became a pioneer of Concrete and Kinetic art, working with new materials such as luminous neon gas and water. He was also one of the founders of the magazine Arturo, one issue of which was published in 1944.
In the following years he co-founded the artist group Madí. Madí urged artists to let the principles of the movement permeate all artistic disciplines (music, dance, theatre, literature, architecture, and so on). The emphasis was on movement, development, and diversity. They wanted to free themselves from the strictures of expression, representation, and signification embodied by the older art. In 1960 Kosice participated in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich and in 1964 he was commissioned to create Argentina’s pavilion for the Venice Biennial.
JUDITH LAUAND (BORN 1922)
Judith Lauand is a Brazilian printmaker and painter currently residing in São Paulo. Lauand began her education in printmaking and painting at the Escola de Belas Artes in Araraquara in the 1940s and finished in 1950. Lauand is the only woman to have joined the Grupo Ruptura, the São Paulo Concretist movement.
Lauand’s early work explores a combination of linear and geometric shapes, whereas her later work can be seen as more analytical. With the influence of Grupo Ruptura, Lauand’s style from 1954 onward gravitated toward structural lines and optical illusions. She was part of the Exposição Nacional de Arte Concreta in São Paulo and also participated in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich in 1960.
Raúl Lozza was an artist, graphic designer, writer, and theoretician. He was one of the founding members of the group Contrapunto in 1943 and the art editor of the group’s eponymous magazine. Shortly thereafter he was also involved in forming the Marxist Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención in 1945. The group admired Piet Mondrian and Theo van Doesburg’s purist aesthetics. Here he was also one of the editors of the group’s periodical.
Together with Juan Alberto Molenberg he developed coplanar painting. Freestanding planar objects were assembled using metal wires in compositions that floated in front of the underlying wall. In 1947, Lozza and his brother Rembrandt V. D. started their own movement, which they called Perceptismo. They launched the manifesto of the movement in 1949 and published a magazine under the same name from 1950 to 1953.
TOMÁS MALDONADO (BORN 1922)
Tomás Maldonado is an artist, graphic designer, and theoretician born in Buenos Aires but living and working in Milan since 1967. He was a co-founder of Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención in 1945, a group that admired Piet Mondrian and Theo van Doesburg’s purist geometric abstractions. Group members created paintings on irregularly shaped canvases and panels and broke away from traditional painting’s illusionist relationship to the frame as a window on another reality.
By the end of the 1940s, Maldonado returned to the orthogonal format. The Marxist-oriented Maldonado had a revolutionary and utopian artistic vision. He also wanted to apply his principles to other areas of society and began working in industrial design. In 1951 he founded the magazine Nueva Vision (1951 – 59). Following an invitation from Max Bill in 1954, he started teaching at the Hochschule für Gestaltung in Ulm, Germany. Eventually he led the school for a few years. After focusing on writing, teaching, and researching for many years, he began painting again in 2000.
JUAN MELÉ (1923–2012)
The painter, sculptor, and critic Juan Melé was born in Buenos Aires but was part of the international art scene for many years. Melé joined the Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención in 1946, and created coplanar paintings and paintings with irregular frames.
A travel grant took him to Europe, where he studied under Sonia Delaunay and Georges Vantongerloo. He also traveled around Europe and in Zurich he came into contact with Max Bill and other Concrete artists. Back in Buenos Aires, he co-founded Grupo Arte Nuevo in 1955. He also started teaching art and writing art criticism. Between 1961 and 1986 he primarily lived and worked in New York, but from 1990 onward he divided his time between Buenos Aires and Paris.
Juan Alberto Molenberg, born in Buenos Aires, was a member of Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención and participated in a number of exhibitions held by the group. Molenberg is considered to have invented the so-called coplanar artwork in 1946, along with Raúl Lozza. By joining together individual flat geometric objects on a common plane, he solved the problem of the artwork as an illusory space within the unifying outer frame.
In the 1950s he collaborated with the journal Contemporánea. Molenberg also worked as a graphic designer and illustrator who specialized in packaging and logotypes.
HÉLIO OITICICA (1937–1980)
Hélio Oiticica studied painting in Rio de Janeiro under Ivan Serpa. From 1955 he participated in Grupo Frente’s exhibitions and he joined the Neo-Concrete Movement in 1960. With monochromatic paintings that hung freely from the ceiling of the exhibition space, he challenged the two-dimensionality of the picture plane. Oiticica developed ideas centered on activist and complex art presented in social contexts, such as in collaboration with residents of Rio’s favelas.
In 1960 Oiticica’s work could be seen in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich. After the military coup in Brazil in 1964 he went into exile in New York. Oiticica wrote in an intricate Portuguese-English inspired by Concrete poetry and influenced by Inca aesthetics and popular culture; he also made films, sculptures, and architectural installations. The installation Tropicália was first shown in 1967 at the Museu de Arte Moderna in Rio de Janeiro and two years later in a solo exhibition at the Whitechapel Art Gallery in London. In 2017, his work was shown in a retrospective touring the United States, entitled To Organize Delirium.
ALEJANDRO OTERO (1921–1990)
Venezuelan painter and sculptor Alejandro Otero started out as a student of Agricultural Studies in the city of Maracay. In 1939, Otero began studying painting, sculpture, and stained-glass art at the Escuela de Arte Plásticas y Artes Aplicadas de Caracas. After finishing his studies in 1945, Otero traveled to Paris on a state scholarship. During this period, he joined the group Los Disidentes. He developed and eventually formalized the abstract geometric painting style he began to work with in the late 1940s.
He would call his later works Colorythms. These works showcase a rhythmic interplay between lines and colors based on an organic practice in which he attempted to achieve a form of unity. Together with Calder, Vasarely, Léger, and Soto, Otero was involved in the art for Carlos Vilanuevas’s newly constructed Caracas University Campus.
LYGIA PAPE (1927–2004)
Brazilian artist and filmmaker Lygia Pape was part of the Rio-based Grupo Frente before she signed the Neo-Concrete Manifesto in 1959. An early example from the Frente period is the series Relevo (Reliefs), for which painted surfaces were joined to create geometric shapes in relief and incorporate the wall in an optical rhythm.
Pape worked in a wide range of techniques, often in parallel, such as painting, woodcut, sculpture, film, and performance. In 1960 Pape’s work was included in the international exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich. She tested boundaries and experimented with materials, at times in provocative ways like when she showed Caixa das baratas (Box of Cockroaches) in 1967, three years after the military coup, in an exhibition arranged by her friend Hélio Oiticica. In Livro da Criação (Book of Creation, 1959) viewers were invited to create their own narratives based on the loose parts of the book.
Carlos María (Rhod) Rothfuss was an artist and theoretician from Montevideo, Uruguay. He moved to Buenos Aires in 1942, where he joined Argentinian avant-garde circles. In an article about the problem of the frame in contemporary art published in the magazine Arturo, Rothfuss argued that the irregular canvas was the solution to the problem of the inability of painting to break away from illusionism. The edge of the canvas, he suggested, should interact with the painting’s inner composition and be an active part of the work.
Rothfuss participated in Asociación Arte Concreto-Invención’s first two exhibitions before he started the group Madí in 1946 with Gyula Kosice and Carmelo Arden Quinn. In the second half of the 1940s, Rothfuss created sculptures with mobile elements.
LUIZ SACILOTTO (1924–2003)
Born near São Paulo, Luíz Sacilotto enrolled in the Escola Profissional Masculina in São Paulo at the age of fourteen, later continuing his painting studies at the Escola Técnica Getúlio Vargas until 1943. While working as a technical designer at architecture studios, he co-founded Grupo Expressionista in 1945, through which he cemented his expressionistic style. He departed from this when joining Grupo Ruptura in São Paulo 1952.
Sacilotto developed his painting style primarily by experimenting with geometric shapes on canvas, all with the title Concreção and an individual number. His sculptures take on a monochromatic and linear approach to geometric abstraction, achieving the effects of an optical illusion.
MIRA SCHENDEL (1919–1988)
Mira Schendel was born in Switzerland and was raised a Catholic in Italy despite her family’s Jewish roots. In 1939, she lost her citizenship and was forced to flee to Sarajevo. She returned to Italy in 1946, only to move to Brazil three years later. From 1952 onward she lived in São Paulo, where she explored non-representational forms of expression in painting, sculpture, and drawing without belonging to any specific group.
Schendel had studied philosophy and was interested in theology, metaphysics, phenomenology, and Zen Buddhism. Many of her works explore how the line influences and activates the surrounding empty space. From the early 1960s onward, thin, translucent rice paper was a recurring element in Schendel’s work. In the series Droguinhas (Little Nothings) (1964 – 66) it was twisted into three-dimensional lines that challenge the very notion of drawing.
Ivan Serpa lived and worked in Rio de Janeiro and was one of the founders of Grupo Frente (1954 – 57). With its freer attitude, Grupo Frente stood in opposition to the São Paulo-based Grupo Ruptura’s more rationalistic interpretation of Concretism. Prior to that, Serpa had worked as an art therapist for psychiatric patients. He held art courses at the newly opened Museu de Arte Moderna in Rio de Janeiro and taught painting, sculpture, and theory to a growing number of interested people of different ages, including professional artists.
Of the fifteen artists in Grupo Frente, all but four had been taught by Serpa at some point. Serpa participated in the São Paulo Biennale on several occasions and the first time it was held, in 1951, he received the Young Artist Award. The following year his work was shown at the Venice Biennale.
JESÚS RAFAEL SOTO (1923–2005)
Jésus Rafael Soto studied at the Escuela de Artes Plásticas y Artes Aplicadas de Caracas in 1942 and became the director of the Escuela de Bellas Artes in Maracaibo, Venezuela, in 1947. In 1950 Soto moved to Paris, where he began to explore kinetic experiences, perception, and movement in his works. In 1958 Soto made Vibraciones, a kinetic mural with wires that seemed to move as audiences passed by. Soto became interested in the notion of “dematerialization,” presenting artworks beyond the Morbergconfines of space and time.
Throughout his career he sought to actively involve spectators, resulting, in the late 1960s, in his Penetrables, where the spectator is invited to move through the plastic strips that form the installation. He participated in Le Mouvement at Galerie Denise René in 1955, in Konkrete Kunst in Zurich in 1960, and in the exhibition Rörelse i konsten at Moderna Museet in 1961.
JOAQUÍN TORRES-GARCÍA (1874–1949)
Joaquín Torres-García was a central figure in the Latin American art scene. He moved from Montevideo to Catalonia with his family when he was young. In Barcelona he met Pablo Picasso, as well as Joan and Julio González. He also worked on glass windows for Antoni Gaudí’s large church project.
After living in New York, Italy, and southern France, he moved to Paris, where he was introduced to Neo-Plasticism by Theo van Doesburg and Piet Mondrian. He also tried to start a Constructivist movement in Madrid shortly before returning to Montevideo in 1934. That same year, a large retrospective exhibition comprising over two hundred of his works was held in Montevideo. The following year he founded Asociación de Arte Constructivo (AAC), and from 1936 to 1943 he published the art review Círculo y Cuadrado.
Torres-García wanted to bridge the gap between classical and modern art with his work. He brought together the abstractions of Constructivism and American pre-Colombian art and took these ideas in a new direction, which he called Constructive Universalism. He continued to propagate his ideas though the studio Taller Torres Garcia that he directed from 1944 onward.
RUBEM VALENTIM (1922–1991)
Rubem Valentim was born in Salvador da Bahia and grew up in São Paulo. Traces of his birthplace’s African heritage can be seen in his colorful paintings, woodcuts, and sculptures. Their geometric visual language incorporates ritualistic symbols and totems that are characteristic of Afro-Brazilian culture.
Valentim was a trained dentist but he took up painting and later completed a degree in journalism. He was a self-taught artist and member of a group that worked toward the artistic renewal of Bahia. After moving to Rio de Janeiro in 1957, Valentim was awarded a travel scholarship in 1962 that enabled a long sojourn in Europe. He returned to his homeland in 1966, invited by the art school in the newly established capital city Brasilia. In 1998, a part of Parque de Esculturas at the Museum of Modern Art in Bahia was dedicated to his memory.
FRANZ WEISSMANN (1914–2005)
Franz Weissmann was born in Austria but moved to Brazil at the beginning of the 1920s. In 1939, he began studying art and architecture at Rio de Janeiro’s Escola Nacional de Belas Artes. Weissmann obtained Brazilian citizenship in 1948 and taught sculpture at the Escola do Parque in Belo Horizonte from 1944 to 1956. In 1955 he joined the Rio-based Grupo Frente and exhibited with them. In 1959, he signed the Neo-Concrete Manifesto and participated in the exhibition Konkrete Kunst in Zurich in 1960.
In the early 1960s, Weissmann went on numerous journeys to Asia and Europe, returning to Rio de Janeiro in 1965. His first abstract works were influenced by Max Bill, but throughout his production he alternated between abstraction, expressionism, and informalism. He experimented with the transformation of different forms, and used iron, stainless steel, zinc, plaster, and aluminum, as well as color, to create visual effects. He was awarded the sculpture prize at the fourth São Paulo Biennale in 1957 and in 1972 he participated in the Venice Biennale.
ANATOL WŁADYSŁAW (1913–2004)
Anatol Władysław was born in Warsaw, Poland, but emigrated to Brazil in 1930 at the age of seventeen. Formally trained as an engineer, he became interested in painting through studying the work of his contemporary Lucy Citti Fereirra.
Prior to joining the São Paulo-based Grupo Ruptura in 1952, Władysław’s paintings showed a more figurative, Impressionistic style. In contrast to his fellow Ruptura peers, Władysław’s emphasis in painting was not on structure, but rather on color. Although there are similarities in how he tackled geometric abstraction, Władysław distinguished himself by employing warm, organic colors. His alliance with Grupa Ruptura was short-lived; in 1954 he left due to his “emotional temperament.” His stylistic and personal outlook in relation to the Ruptura movement has made it difficult to place him within the context of Brazilian art history.
Ellsworth Kelly (May 31, 1923 – December 27, 2015) was an American painter, sculptor, and printmaker associated with hard-edge painting, Color Field painting and minimalism. His works demonstrate unassuming techniques emphasizing line, color and form, similar to the work of John McLaughlin and Kenneth Noland. Kelly often employed bright colors. He lived and worked in Spencertown, New York.
Since the beginning of his career, Ellsworth Kelly’s emphasis on pure form and color and his impulse to suppress gesture in favor of creating spatial unity have played a pivotal role in the development of abstract art in America. A major influence on Pop Art, Minimalism, hard-edge and color field painting, Ellsworth Kelly’s best-known works are distinguished by sharply delineated shapes flatly painted in vivid color, such as Colors for a Large Wall (1951). His abstract paintings are inspired by the interplay of light, space, and color in the architecture around him. In contrast, Kelly’s automatic drawings feature delicate outlines of bodies and flora.
Considered a pioneer of hard-edge painting, Ellsworth Kelly is best known for his crisp nonrepresentational works, intensely colored and radically simplified. His early training in the applied art program at Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, was interrupted by his induction into the army in 1943. Art Historian E. C. Goossen has speculated that Kelly’s assignment to a camouflage battalion provided him with invaluable lessons about the interaction of form and shadow in space, which were applied later in his collages, paintings, and sculpture.
After studying for two years at the School of the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, Kelly went to Paris in 1948 to attend the École des Beaux-Arts until 1950. In France he encountered the works of Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Jean Arp, and Piet Mondrian. His figurative work subsequently gave way to increasingly abstract paintings in which curvilinear and rectilinear forms suggest fragments of visual phenomena such as architectural elements and shadows.
In 1950 he began to explore the random selection of color and form by using collages, composed of torn details of his drawings, as the basis for his paintings. While in France Kelly also produced grid paintings built on modular and serial systems. By 1952 these concerns were expressed in large multipanel paintings in which each panel was a module of color. Kelly’s concern with color as form was thus established.
After returning to the United States in 1954, Kelly worked with large single biomorphic shapes in black and white. Primary colors reappeared in his paintings after 1957, either in double or triple variations or singly in contrast with white, as in Blue on White [SAAM, 1969.47.63].
National Museum of American Art (CD-ROM) (New York and Washington D.C.: MacMillan Digital in cooperation with the National Museum of American Art, 1996)
Image/paper size: 37 1/2 x 84 inches (95.2 x 213.4 cm) Edition of 15, 6 AP Signed ‘Kelly’ and numbered lower right
SELECTED WORKS
Dark Gray Curve
Ellsworth KellyDark Gray Curve 1988Two color lithograph on Arches Cover paper
Image/paper size: 26 x 84 inches (66 x 213.4 cm) Frame size: 28 7/8 x 86 7/8 inches (73.3 x 220.7 cm) Edition of 25 Signed “Kelly’ and numbered lower right in graphite
Untitled (Purple State I)
Ellsworth KellyUntitled (Purple State I) 1988One color lithograph on Arches 88 paper
Image/paper size: 51 x 46 inches (129.5 x 116.8 cm) Edition of 18 Signed, numbered and dated lower right
Green
Ellsworth KellyGreen 2001One-color lithograph on Rives BFK white paper
Image/paper size: 48 1/16 x 36 inches (122.1 x 91.4 cm) Edition of 45 Signed ‘Kelly’ and numbered lower right in graphite
Red-Orange (Rouge-Orange)
Ellsworth KellyRed-Orange (Rouge-Orange) 1964-65Lithograph on Rives BFK white paper with deckled edge
Image size: 18 1/8 x 25 1/8 inches (46 x 63.8 cm) Paper size: 23 3/4 x 35 1/4 inches (60.3 x 89.5 cm) Edition of 75 Signed “Kelly” lower right, numbered lower left; Titled, dated, numbered and inscribed ‘Axom 6’ on reverse in graphite
Blue Yellow Red
Ellsworth KellyBlue Yellow Red 1990Three-color lithograph on Rives BFK white paper with deckled edge
Image size: 30 1/16 x 30 1/8 inches (76.4 x 76.5 cm) Paper size: 37 1/8 x 36 1/8 inches (94.3 x 91.8 cm) Edition of 80, 25 AP Signed lower right and numbered lower left
Two Blacks and White
Ellsworth KellyTwo Blacks and White 2000Lithograph on Rives BFK white paper
Image/paper size: 30 1/16 x 30 1/16 inches (76.4 x 76.4 cm) Edition of 46 Signed ‘Kelly’ and numbered lower right in graphite
Small Red Curve
Ellsworth KellySmall Red Curve 2012One color lithograph on Rives BFK paper
Image/paper size: 17 7/16 x 12 1/2 inches (44.3 x 31.8 cm) Edition of 100 Signed and numbered lower right in graphite
Image/paper size: 14 1/16 x 10 inches (35.7 x 25.4 cm) Edition of 150 Signed ‘Kelly’ and numbered lower right in image
Concorde II (State) from The Concorde Series
Ellsworth KellyConcorde II (State) from The Concorde Series 1981Etching and aquatint with plate tone on Arches Cover paper with deckled edge
Image/plate size: 16 3/4 x 12 3/16 inches (42.5 x 31 cm) Paper size: 32 3/4 x 25 1/8 inches (83.2 x 63.8 cm) Frame size: 34 3/4 x 27 1/4 inches (88.3 x 69.2 cm) Edition of 18 Signed lower right and numbered lower left in graphite
Concorde IV from The Concorde Series
Ellsworth KellyConcorde IV from The Concorde Series 1981-82Etching with aquatint on Arches Cover paper with deckled edge
Image/plate size: 16 x 12 1/2 inches (40.6 x 31.8 cm) Paper size: 34 1/2 x 25 7/8 inches (87.6 x 65.7 cm) Edition of 18 Signed lower right, numbered lower left in graphite
Concorde V from The Concorde Series
Ellsworth KellyConcorde V from The Concorde Series 1981-82Etching with aquatint on Arches Cover paper with deckled edge
Image/plate size: 10 1/4 x 8 5/16 inches (26 x 21.1 cm) Paper size: 26 1/2 x 21 1/4 inches (67.3 x 54 cm) Edition of 18 Signed lower right and numbered lower left in graphite
Cul de Sac
Ellsworth KellyCul de Sac 1984One-color lithograph on Arches 88 paper
Image size: 35 5/8 x 49 3/8 inches (90.5 x 125.4 cm) Paper size: 42 5/8 x 56 5/8 inches (108.3 x 143.8 cm) Edition of 25 Signed, numbered and dated
String Bean Leaves III (Haricot Vert III)
Ellsworth KellyString Bean Leaves III (Haricot Vert III) 1965-1966Lithograph
Image/paper size: 35 5/8 x 24 1/2 inches (90.5 x 62.2 cm) Edition of 75 Signed ‘Kelly’ lower right, numbered lower left in graphite
Leaf V From the series Twelve Leaves
Ellsworth KellyLeaf V From the series Twelve Leaves 1978One-color lithograph
Edition of 20 Signed, titled and numbered ‘Kelly Leaf V AP 5/9’ lower right in pencil Image/paper size: 30 x 42 inches (76.2 x 106.7 cm)
Leaf X
Ellsworth KellyLeaf X 1978Lithograph
Image/paper size: 30 x 42 inches (76.2 x 106.7 cm) Edition of 20 Signed ‘Kelly’, numbered and titled lower right
Leaves
Ellsworth KellyLeaves 1978One-color lithograph
Image/paper size: 30 x 42 inches (76.2 x 106.7 cm) Edition of 30 Signed and numbered ‘Kelly AP 7/9’ lower right in graphite (Inventory #29110)Inquire
Leaf III
Ellsworth KellyLeaf III 1978Lithograph
Image/paper size: 30 x 42 inches (76.2 x 106.7 cm) Edition of 20 Signed ‘Kelly’, numbered and titled lower right (Inventory #26503)Inquire
Sunflower II
Ellsworth KellySunflower II 1995-2004Lithograph on Rives BFK wove paper
Image/paper size: 37 x 29 inches (94 x 73.7 cm) Frame size: 40 1/4 x 32 1/4 inches (102.2 x 81.9 cm) Edition of 60 Signed and numbered lower right in graphite (Inventory #30610)
Wild Grape Leaves II
Ellsworth KellyWild Grape Leaves II 2004Lithograph
Image/paper size: 23 x 31 inches (58.4 x 78.7 cm) Edition of 60 Signed and numbered lower right in graphite
Born on a farm in rural Saskatchewan, Canada, Agnes Martin immigrated to the United States in 1932 in the hopes of becoming a teacher. After earning a degree in art education, she moved to the desert plains of Taos, New Mexico, where she made abstract paintings with organic forms, which attracted the attention of renowned New York gallerist Betty Parsons, who convinced the artist to join her roster and move to New York in 1957. There, Martin lived and worked on Coenties Slip, a street in Lower Manhattan, alongside a community of artists—including Robert Indiana, Ellsworth Kelly, and Jack Youngerman—who were all drawn to the area’s cheap rents, expansive loft spaces and proximity to the East River. Harbor Number 1 (1957), one of Martin’s earliest New York paintings, combines the geometric abstraction of her earlier Taos work with the newfound inspiration of the harbor landscape, evident in her choice of blue-gray palette.
Over the course of the next decade, Martin developed her signature format: six by six foot painted canvases, covered from edge to edge with meticulously penciled grids and finished with a thin layer of gesso. Though she often showed with other New York abstractionists, Martin’s focused pursuit charted new terrain that lay outside of both the broad gestural vocabulary of Abstract Expressionism and the systematic repetitions of Minimalism. Rather, her practice was tethered to spirituality and drew from a mix of Zen Buddhist and American Transcendentalist ideas. For Martin, painting was “a world without objects, without interruption… or obstacle. It is to accept the necessity of … going into a field of vision as you would cross an empty beach to look at the ocean.
In 1967, at the height of her career, Martin faced the loss of her home to new development, the sudden death of her friend Ad Reinhardt, and the growing strain of mental illness; she left New York, and returned to Taos, where she abandoned painting, instead pursuing writing and meditation in isolation. Her return to painting in 1974 was marked by a subtle shift in style: no longer defined by the delicate graphite grid, compositions such as Untitled Number 5 (1975) display bolder geometric schemes—like distant relatives of her earliest works. In these late paintings, Martin evoked the warm palette of the arid desert landscape where she remained for the rest of her life.
Agnes Bernice Martin (March 22, 1912 – December 16, 2004) was a Canadian-born American abstract painter. Her work has been defined as an “essay in discretion on inward-ness and silence”. Although she is often considered or referred to as a minimalist, Martin considered herself an abstract expressionist. She was awarded a National Medal of Arts from the National Endowment for the Arts in 1998.
El diseño ha proporcionado soluciones contra la propagación de las epidemias en la historia y esta no es una excepción, pero con criterio. Arquitectura, arte y ciencia se unen para dar un mensaje: la desinformación es la peor de las pandemias.
A la izquierda, uno de los retratos de la serie ‘Cómo sobrevivir a un virus global mortal’, con la que el artista Max Siedentogf llama a la calma. A la derecha, el prototipo del escudo ‘Be A Batman’, del arquitecto chino Sun Dayong, que no solo evita el contagio, sino que mantiene la temperatura en la que el virus muere.
El coronavirus, llamado en términos médicos COVID-19, todavía no ha sido declarado pandemia, pero su expansión imparable por todo el mundo hace crecer la paranoia alimentada por el ciclo diabólico de las noticias. Las imágenes de ciudades enteras en cuarentena, aeropuertos cerrados, supermercados vacíos y la cancelación de los eventos internacionales empezaron en Asia, continuaron por Europa, con Milán como centro neurálgico, y amenazan ahora a Estados Unidos. El futuro apocalíptico de las películas de ciencia ficción se palpa en esos lugares.
Desde Leonardo Da Vinci en el siglo XV hasta la actualidad, los diseñadores han buscado soluciones para prevenir la propagación de las plagas con ideas que reflejan las fobias y los miedos humanos más profundos. Pero que también crean una estética de la pandemia, ya sea con hospitales de campaña levantados en tiempo récord, mascarillas como código de vestimenta obligatorio o aparatos de alta tecnología como drones y mapas interactivos de su avance. O el curioso caddie –un híbrido entre el Papa-móvil y el sillón Retreat Pod, de Roger Dean– con el que evacúan a las personas con síntomas de coronavirus en los aeropuertos de China.
Pronto nos podríamos ver todos ataviados con el escudo Be A Batman (“sé un Batman”), creado por el arquitecto chino Sun Dayong a raíz de la aparición del coronavirus. Es un accesorio futurista inspirado en los murciélagos, una de las posibles fuentes del COVID-19, cuyas temperaturas corporales aumentan mientras vuelan, lo que les permite sobrevivir a pesar de tener la enfermedad.
Un posible paciente de coronavirus es evacuado en un aeropuerto de China el pasado enero. | XINYAN YU / TWITTER
Dayong, confundador del estudio Penda, ha utilizado un material de fibra de carbono para crear una membrana corporal que se cuelga como una mochila. Tiene una película de PVC con unos cables incrustados que calientan el plástico a una temperatura lo suficientemente elevada para matar al patógeno.
Este traje de protección es todavía un prototipo, pero su creador espera encontrar un patrocinador y ofrece sus servicios de forma gratuita. Después de contener una epidemia, piensa que el escudo se podría actualizar con la tecnología de Google Glass, o simplemente usarse como un “espacio móvil privado único para las personas”.
La cuarentena es, por el momento, el método más eficaz y más antiguo para luchar contra virus como el de Wuhan. Leonardo Da Vinci, tras sobrevivir a las plagas bubónicas que azotaron Milán entre 1484 y 1485, diseñó una ciudad futura de tres niveles que eliminaba los barrios abarrotados y separaba el comercio, la vivienda y el transporte. Nunca se llegó a construir.
Plano de Leonardo da Vinci para la ciudad ideal, diseñada tras las plagas bubónicas que azotaron Milán entre 1484 y 1485.
Fue el primer proyecto de planificación urbanística pensado con ideas de higiene y prevención de enfermedades. Ya en el siglo XIX, la tuberculosis impulsó la construcción de sanatorios, como el famoso Paimio, del arquitecto finlandés Alvar Aalto en el sudoeste de Finlandia. En esta ocasión, China ha logrado una hazaña de la arquitectura y la ingeniería de cuarentena defensiva con la construcción en diez días de un hospital de 34.000 metros cuadrados y mil camas en Wuhan, epicentro del brote. Y espera abrir el segundo para 1.500 enfermos en los próximos días.
Una realidad distópica de humanos con sus propios rostros impresos en unas máscaras es el efecto que provoca la creación de Danielle Baskin. Diseñadora de producto, emprendedora y artista visual a partes iguales de 32 años, ha inventado estos accesorios que permiten desbloquear los teléfonos que funcionan por reconocimiento facial y seguir utilizándolos mientras se lucha contra el virus.
La diseñadora Danielle Baskin muestra su prototipo de máscara de rtostro humano que permite desbloquear la pantalla del teléfono con reconocimiento facial. | DANIELLE BASKIN
Cuando un tuitero le preguntó si era una broma, Baskin contestó: “Si. No. No estamos seguros. Los virus no son una broma. Lávate las manos cuando puedas. Y vacúnate cuando puedas”. Los ha probado en el modelo N95, uno de los antifaces más comunes, pero no estarán disponibles durante la actual crisis vírica por la imposibilidad de cubrir el alto número de pedidos que ha recibido.
La desinformación es la verdadera amenaza
Un chiste parecen las múltiples soluciones caseras que los ciudadanos lucen estos días por las calles de las principales urbes del mundo. La crisis del coronavirus ha agudizado el ingenio. Cuentas de Instagram como la neoyorquina Subway creatures o la china Shanghai Observed recogen los modelos más disparatados hechos ad hoc que se ven estos días en las calles.
El miedo irracional al coronavirus ha llevado al diseñador y artista germano-namibio Max Siedentopf, residente en Londres, a crear una docena de retratos provocativos con personas ataviadas con mascarillas hechas con ropa interior, una hoja de lechuga, una botella de plástico o una compresa.
Bajo el título Cómo sobrevivir a un virus global mortal, Siedentogf pretende ofrecer “soluciones útiles para usar objetos cotidianos simples para protegerse”. Una crítica a la desesperación por comprar máscaras, a pesar de que los médicos hayan advertido de su eficacia limitada. El mensaje, con el que el artista pretendía “sacarnos de nuestra zona de confort”, no ha sido recibido como esperaba y Siedentogf ha tenido que pedir disculpas a las decenas de personas que escribieron sintiéndose ofendidas por este trabajo.
‘Cómo sobrevivir a un virus global mortal’, la serie de retratos del artista Max Siedentopf, en los que utiliza objetos cotidianos como máscaras antivirus. | MAX SIEDENTOPF‘Cómo sobrevivir a un virus global mortal’. | MAX SIEDENTOPF
Aun así, lo más útil en estas circunstancias es no dejarse llevar por el pánico. La desinformación es la amenaza real. Con los precedentes de respuestas mal calculadas en casos como el VIH o el ébola, los investigadores de la Universidad de Johns Hopkins de Baltimore (Maryland) han desarrollado un mapa donde se puede seguir en vivo la propagación de la epidemia. Su objetivo es impulsar la comprensión científica y aumentar la percepción pública del riesgo: de los 95.748 casos totales detectados hasta el momento de la publicación de este artículo, 53.422 se han recuperado.
Con este enfoque, el Museo Americano de Historia Natural de Nueva York organizó dos exposiciones: Epidemia (1999) y Cuenta atrás para cero (2015-2017) sobre el desarrollo de las pandemias buscando neutralizar los temores, fomentar la empatía con las víctimas y la importancia de la ciencia. En definitiva: el diseño, la crítica, el arte y la ciencia unidas en un solo mensaje: que no cunda el pánico.
Premier Art Fairs in Cologne, Buenos Aires, Dallas Postponed Over Coronavirus Concerns
With more and more governments across the world calling for large-scale gatherings of people to be canceled and postponed in face of the continued spread of the coronavirus (Covid-19), three major art fairs—one in Buenos Aires that is considered to be among Latin America’s premier fairs; one in Cologne, Germany, that is a destination for collectors; and one in Texas—said they would postpone this year’s editions.
Art Cologne, the world’s oldest art fair, said it would postpone this year’s edition until November 19–22. It had originally been slated to run April 23–26. The fair was to convene more than 170 galleries from around the world.
“The health of all trade fair participants is our top priority,” the fair said in a statement. While the government that oversees Cologne had banned gatherings with more 1,000 until April 10, the fair said it was postponing this year’s edition because its organizers were expecting the ban to be prolonged.
coronavirus protection suit
In a statement sent to ARTnews, the organizers of arteBA, the fair in Argentina’s capital, said that they had no choice but to postpone the upcoming main fair and its satellite event, “Utopia 2020,” both scheduled for April 16–19, after the government of Buenos Aires suspended all major gatherings. ArteBA said that each year the fair receives around 90,000 visitors during its run.
The arteBA statement reads, “The measure is in line with the recommendations of authorities and specialists and with the efforts that the main actors of the art world are making on a global level in the face of this problem.… The organizers of arteBA stress that their first priority is to ensure the well-being and health of all those who are in one way or another linked to the fair, especially in an extremely delicate context such as the current one.”
ArteBA said it did not immediately have new dates, and that the timing for this year’s fair would be determined “once the conditions for the fair to run in an absolutely safe way.” The statement added that “special consideration” would be given to the “opinions and interests” of the participating exhibitors, sponsors, artist-run spaces, and more that contribute to the fair.
The organizers of the Dallas Art Fair in Texas also said that it would postpone the upcoming edition. Originally set to run April 16-19, it will now take place October 1–4. The fair said it would honor all tickets that had been purchased for the April dates.
In a statement, Kelly Cornell, the Dallas Art Fair’s director, said “While the decision was not made easily, the health and wellbeing of the Dallas Art Fair’s gallerists, visitors, and staff are our top priority and the fair must make every effort to contain the spread of the virus.”
Across the world, several art fairs have also recently called off their scheduled editions running this month and next, including the L.A. Art Book Fair and Paris Photo New York, which said on Wednesday, March 11 that they would not go on as planned.
To minimize health risks during the coronavirus outbreak, LA Plaza de Cultura y Artes is closed until further notice. We have canceled or postponed public programs and rentals through mid-May. School hands-on workshops, tours and teacher training are cancelled or postponed throughout March, April and mid-May.
Keep up-to-date on developments on our website and on our social media pages.
Thank you for your support.
Saturday, March 14, 2020 – 10:00am
To minimize health risks during the coronavirus outbreak, LA Plaza de Cultura y Artes is closed until further notice. We have canceled or postponed public programs and rentals throughout March. School hands-on workshops, tours and teacher training are cancelled or postponed throughout March and April.
Keep up-to-date on developments on our website and on our social media pages.
Thank you for your support.
Thursday, March 12, 2020 – 4:40pm
While the situation with the coronavirus COVID-19 is rapidly evolving, our highest priority is the health, safety, and well-being of our staff, visitors and LA Plaza community.
We are committed to following the recommendations of local health officials, including the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.
To minimize health risks during the coronavirus outbreak, LA Plaza de Cultura y Artes is taking the following measures:
• Our galleries and LA Tienda museum gift store will close to the public beginning March 16 until further notice.
• We have increased the cleaning and disinfecting of our facilities and have ample prevention supplies on hand, including sinks with soap, hand sanitizers, and tissues.
• LA Plaza’s public programs and rentals through March are cancelled or postponed. Programs will be rescheduled and/or livestreamed as appropriate.
• Guided School Group Visits, Hands-on Workshops and Teacher Trainings are cancelled for the months of March and April.
• Our staff will be on a limited work schedule.
If you have already purchased tickets for any of our paid events, you will receive a separate notification via email with additional information related to your reservation.
We appreciate your understanding and collaboration as we respond to this public health challenge. Please be assured that we are assessing new developments in this rapidly evolving situation, in order to assure the safety of our community and visitors.
Last updated: March 14, 2020, 3:20 p.m.
Argentina
ArteBA, which was slated to take place in the country’s capital city from April 16–19, postponed its upcoming edition after the government of Buenos Aires suspended all major gatherings. The fair was also forced to postpone its satellite event titled “Utopia 2020.” ArteBA did not immediately provide new dates for its event, but said in a statement that it would be decided with “special consideration” of the “opinions and interests” of the participating exhibitors, sponsors, and other contributors.
Austria
Several museums in Austria have closed, and others have said they would allow only 100 people at any given time. The Albertina, the Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien, the Kunsthaus Wien, the Leopold Museum, and all three locations managed by the Belvedere said on March 11 that they would remain closed until further notice. The Museum der Moderne Salzburg and the Kunsthalle Wien in Vienna said they would stay open and admit only 100 visitors at a time in accordance with the government’s ban of indoor gatherings of more than 100 people.
Brazil
While coronavirus cases have been confirmed in the country, no major museums or fairs have altered their programming. The SP-Arte fair has confirmed that it will go on as planned, running from April 1–5.
China
China, where the coronavirus was first recognized, has been among the countries most deeply affected by the outbreak. Museums, biennials, and fairs took prompt action, closing their doors within days after it became clear that it was becoming difficult to contain the pathogen.
The National Art Museum of China in Beijing, the Guangdong Art Museum in Guangzhou, and the Union Art Museum in Wuhan are among the institutions that have closed their doors indefinitely. China’s UCCA Center for Contemporary Art was forced to postpone three exhibitions as a result of officials’ recommendations. The He Art Museum, a new private museum located in the Shunde district of Foshan, in Guangdong Province, also said it will postpone its grand opening, originally set for March 21.
Gallery Weekend Beijing, which was scheduled for this month, decided it would delay its 2020 edition, with tentative plans to hold it in mid-April—and to potentially cancel altogether, if conditions have not improved by mid-March. Meanwhile, the March opening of Beijing’s X Museum, a 26,000-square-foot private museum from collector Michael Xufu Huang and businesswoman Theresa Tse, was postponed. And the inaugural edition of CAFAM Techne Triennial, which had been slated to open February 20 at the CAFA Art Museum in Beijing, was postponed last month, with no new opening date announced. The Design Shanghai fair, which was slated for March, has been moved to late May.
France
French president Emmanuel Macron has warned that the outbreak of the coronavirus in his country “will last weeks and perhaps months.” In response, the government has banned all gatherings of more than 5,000 people. Though that does not apply to museums, one of the world’s biggest museums briefly closed: the Louvre in Paris, whose staff made the decision to shutter the museum for several days to discuss how best to respond to the coronavirus’s spread. The museum reopened after France’s Minister of Culture and Ministry of Health assured staff that is safe to continue to run business as usual, though it said on March 4 that it would no longer accept cash for tickets so as to prevent the virus from spreading within its staff. On March 9, the Louvre and the Musée d’Orsay said they would stay open, but their workers would limit the amount of people who could visit at a given time.
On March 14, the Louvre in Paris announced that it would close indefinitely. The Musée d’Orsay and Musée de l’Orangerie are among the other major institutions that have also closed.
Denmark
The Louisiana Museum of Modern Art in Humlebaek will be closed through March 27, and the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen will be shuttered until at least March 30. The number of cases in Denmark rose over 300 on March 11.
Germany
Art Cologne, the oldest art fair in the world, announced that it would postpone this year’s edition until November. It had been set to take place from April 23 to 26, with some 170 galleries participating. Berlin’s state-run museums also announced closures.
The Berlin State Museums—a group that includes the Altes Museum, Gemäldegalerie, Pergamonmuseum, Neue Nationalgalerie, and Museum für Fotografie—said that they would be closed from March 14 onwards. The Jewish Museum and the KW Institute for Contemporary Art in Berlin have also announced closures.
The Haus der Kunst in Munich will be closed until April 20, and the Museum Ludwig in Cologne will be shuttered through April 19.
Hong Kong
In what some have said could be a boon for business in the territory, Art Basel Hong Kong canceled its 2020 edition entirely. The fair instead offered some galleries the opportunity to sell their wares via an online viewing room, where sales will be live from March 20 to 25 with preview days on March 18 and 19. Public museums in Hong Kong were among the first to be forced to close in January. In response to the crisis, Sotheby’s has relocated its modern and contemporary Hong Kong sales to New York in April.
On March 11, several public museums—including Hong Kong Museum of Art and Hong Kong Heritage Museum—partially reopened.
Ireland
The Irish Museum of Modern Art said that after, the museum closed to visitors on March 12, it would remain shuttered through at least March 15.
Italy
Museums in northern Italy experienced closures in February but began reopening in early March. Affected institutions included the Peggy Guggenheim Collection and ARTnews Top 200 collector François Pinault’s Palazzo Grassi, both in Venice; the Fondazione Prada in Milan; and the Castello di Rivoli in Turin. The Duomo di Milano also closed temporarily, and the Venice galleries Alma Zevi and Victoria Miro were impacted as well. The Venice Architecture Biennale announced on March 4 that it would postpone its 2020 edition, originally scheduled to open in May, until August. After some museums in Italy’s Lombardy region briefly reopened in early March, they shuttered once again, as part of an order from the country’s government to close all institutions. Among the institutions to close was Rome’s Scuderie del Quirinale, which was opened a blockbuster Raphael show in early March, only to shutter it days later. Many galleries in the country’s northern region—including Cassina Projects, Massimo De Carlo, and Monica de Cardenas—were forced to close. Monitor, which has spaces in Rome and Pereto, closed its locations and had to delay the opening of an exhibition at its Lisbon location.
Japan
Institutions across Japan have said they would be closed until mid-March. Among them are the Mori Art Museum in Tokyo, the Kyoto National Museum, and the National Museum of Art in Osaka. Blum & Poe gallery was forced to postpone several exhibitions in its Tokyo space and adjust its hours of operation. Tokyo’s National Museum of Western Art, which will remain closed through March 16, was set to open an exhibition of major loans from the National Gallery in London on March 3.
Netherlands
The European Fine Art Fair in Maastricht had said that it would go on as planned from March 7 to 15, even after three exhibitors—Wildenstein and Co. (of New York), Fergus McCaffrey (New York), and Galerie Monbrison (Paris)—dropped out. The fair, which convened some 280 galleries, said in a statement that it would increase “precautionary measures, such as additional all-day cleaning services and distribution and placement of hand sanitizers at the fair.” On March 11, after the Art Newspaper reported that an exhibitor tested positive for the virus, the fair closed several days early.
On March 12, major museums in the Netherlands announced temporary closures. The Rijksmuseum and the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam said they would remain closed until March 31. The Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam and the Mauritshuis Museum in the Hague will also be shuttered through the end of March.
South Korea
In response to what South Korean president Moon Jae-in has called “a grave turning point” for the country, the Leeum Samsung Museum of Art, the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, and the National Museum of Korea, all of them located in Seoul, have been closed until further notice. Gyeongbokgung Palace, one of the city’s most popular tourist attractions, has suspended all official guided tours “until further notice,” according to the palace’s website.
Spain
Spain’s Ministry of Culture and Sports ordered 13 national museums—including the Prado, Reina Sofía, and the Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum in Madrid—to close on March 12. These institutions, however, are providing some online offers for visitors. The Thyssen-Bornemisza created a virtual tour of its exhibition “Rembrandt and Portraiture in Amsterdam, 1590–1670” that can be accessed online, and the Prado posted a 20-minute talk, given by its director, Miguel Falomir, on Tintoretto’s Christ Washing the Disciples’ Feet.
United Arab Emirates
Art Dubai has postponed its 2020 fair, which was originally scheduled for late March. A new opening date has not been set, though the fair has announced it will organize a program in the city during the event’s planned dates. The Sharjah Art Foundation will postpone an arts summit slated to run from March 21–23 until further notice; its exhibition spaces will continue to remain open during regular public hours. Other Emirati arts organizations, including the Jameel Arts Centre, the Alserkal Avenue organization, and the Louvre Abu Dhabi, have not yet announced any plans to close or cancel events.
United States
No major American institutions have temporarily shuttered yet in response to the coronavirus, though many are beginning to take precautions. Nearly a dozen New York museums reached by ARTnews—including the Guggenheim, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Morgan Library & Museum, and the Frick Collection—said that they are monitoring the situation closely. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Times reported that the Getty Trust has formed a coronavirus task force to keep its employees, volunteers, and visitors safe; the institution has also canceled all employee travel to Italy, China, and South Korea. The city’s Museum of Contemporary Art has established a task force as well, and the Art Institute of Chicago has limited staff travel. Meanwhile, the fairs held in New York during Armory Week—the ADAA Art Show, the Armory Show, the Independent, and the Spring/Break Art Show—went on as planned, albeit with more sanitizer than usual.
In mid-March, news of the first major exhibition postponements starting coming in. Gagosian and Pace Gallery, both in New York, indefinitely delayed their planned exhibitions of works from the Donald Marron collection, and the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. said a blockbuster with work by Genoese Baroque artists would not happen in May as planned.
On Mach 11, the L.A. Art Book Fair, which was scheduled to take place at the Geffen Contemporary space of L.A.’s Museum of Contemporary Art from April 3 to 5, was canceled. That same day, Paris Photo New York, which had been set to run from April 2 to 5 at Pier 94, announced that it would would be postponed, with new dates to be announced as soon as possible.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art became the first major New York institution to announce that it would close temporarily in an attempt to mitigate the spread of the virus. Starting on Friday, March 13, the museum will close all three of its locations. At the time the news broke, the museum had not announced a reopening date. The Museum of Modern Art, the Whitney Museum, the Brooklyn Museum, the Bronx Museum of the Arts, the Jewish Museum, and the New Museum were also among those who announced closures. In Boston, four museums—the Harvard Art Museums, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, the Institute of Contemporary Art, and the Museum of Fine Arts—also announced that they would indefinitely close.
Three mega-galleries also said they would temporarily close some American locations. David Zwirner has plans to close two out of three of its New York spaces, Hauser & Wirth will close its New York and Los Angeles galleries, and Pace Gallery will shutter its New York flagship.
The Dallas Art Fair in Texas said that it would postpone its 2020 edition, which had been scheduled from April 16–19. It plans to take place from October 1–4, honoring tickets purchased for the April dates.
The Getty Museum and Getty Villa in Los Angeles announced that they would be closed beginning March 14. The museum said in a statement issued on March 12 that “given the fluidity and uncertainty of the current crisis, Getty cannot determine the duration of the closure at this time.”
On March 18, Frieze New York announced that it would cancel its 2020 edition, scheduled for early May, and that it would begin work on its 2021 edition.